docs: diagnose Conversation Agent ownership

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-25 15:41:10 +08:00
parent 03f96170bb
commit c4ca16fa19

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
# Task: Diagnose Conversation Agent ownership mismatch
## Identity
- Task ID: 20260825-conversation-agent-binding-8a4c2e71
- Mode: Feature
- Branch: codex/20260825-conversation-agent-binding-8a4c2e71-conversation-agent-binding
- Worktree: D:\Datas\OthersProjects\makelore-conversation-agent-binding-8a4c2e71
- Base commit: 03f96170bb914cd5f8627bc898c9ba5835379531
- Owner: codex-root
- Status: Done
## Scope
- Diagnose why the installed Windows product appears to show a Conversation outside the created Agent.
- Verify the active project's persisted Agent/Conversation ownership and trace the Renderer grouping logic.
- Produce an evidence-backed explanation only; do not modify product code, user data, or the installed application.
## Intent And Constraints
- Distinguish persisted ownership from visual nesting and do not treat a layout expectation as data corruption.
- Read only Agent ids/names and Conversation metadata; do not inspect prompts, message bodies, Provider credentials, or secrets.
- Do not create subagents. The user requested direct analysis.
- Base the diagnosis on cumulative Pi delivery HEAD `03f96170bb914cd5f8627bc898c9ba5835379531` and the installed user's active project catalog.
## Project Context Loaded
- Loaded the project-memory startup set and relevant architecture/business-rule indexes.
- Reviewed the PI-020 schema-v2, PI-100 core Host API, PI-120 first-Conversation UX, PI-130 feature UI, and latest installed-package hotfix task records.
- Audited active task ownership. No product-write overlap exists because this task is read-only; the older partner-create-model-parity task has undefined scope and would require coordination before any later Agent/Conversation implementation change.
## Plan
1. Resolve the installed product's active project from the compatibility project catalog.
2. Join `.niancode/project.json` Agents to `.niancode/conversations.json` by `agentId` and count missing or ambiguous owners.
3. Trace creation validation, persistence, selected-Agent filtering, and Conversation rendering in the current source.
4. Run the focused existing UI regression and report confirmed facts, inference, and any remaining hypothesis.
## Outcome
- The active installed project is `D:\Datas\GameProjects\testgame` and contains one enabled, unarchived Agent named `ccc`.
- Both unarchived Conversations have `agentId=custom-agent-1787571715919-1`, which resolves uniquely to `ccc`; orphan count is zero.
- Conversation creation validates the requested Agent and persists its id. Runtime preparation revalidates that the persisted Agent remains available.
- The Renderer intentionally uses a master-detail layout: the Agent list and Conversation list are sibling sections, while the Conversation list is filtered to the selected Agent. The apparent lack of nesting is therefore a presentation choice, not an ownership defect.
## Verification
- Installed-data ownership join: passed; 2 Conversations, both uniquely owned by `ccc`, 0 orphaned or ambiguous records.
- Static source trace: passed; creation, persistence, runtime preparation, selection, and rendering all enforce the same `agentId` relation.
- `corepack pnpm exec vitest run tests/unit/coding-chat-panel.test.tsx --maxWorkers=1` on delivered HEAD `03f9617`: passed, 1 file / 15 tests, including Agent-switch Conversation selection isolation.
## Follow-ups
- If the product should visually communicate hierarchy, create a separate UX change to nest Conversations under each Agent or label the Conversation section with the selected Agent name. This diagnosis does not authorize that change.
## Promotion Candidates
- None recorded.