docs: require students to articulate adopted teacher advice

.project-docs/30-worklog/tasks/20261008-teacher-consensus-integration-a9c2d7e1.md

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 ## Scope
 
 - Integrate the explicitly approved teacher Agent consensus into product positioning, README, the teacher ADR, decision index and current integrated state.
+- Resume the same consensus task for the user's correction requiring student understanding and self-expression before operation Agent execution.
 
 ## Intent And Constraints
 
@@ -20,6 +21,7 @@
 - Documentation only. Preserve current runtime, published configurations and permissions. No personal Codex history access or distillation implementation.
 - Concurrent and Planning Gates passed. Required project memory, evidence/reflection/commitment indexes and peer scopes were read; related runtime tasks have no dependency on this prose change. One older child-language task has incomplete scope and is not a source for this integration.
 - Source proposal `5506922ba9e6528895eab965ef9beae3d7528ebe` exists in the shared Git repository; its completed source task record was reviewed read-only. Its exceptional-person positioning conflict is resolved by the user's explicit new direction. The source branch is retained without merging its administrative record.
+- The user explicitly rejects direct teacher-to-operation execution handoff. Do not infer an exam, automatic understanding score, execution gate or a ban on sharing project facts from this correction. Resumed ownership and Planning Gates passed; peer records were re-read without changes.
 
 ## Outcome
 
@@ -27,12 +29,15 @@
 - Recorded explicit/tacit knowledge and contextual evidence direction, candidate elicitation sources, primary research limits, and teacher participation in independent held-out mapping acceptance.
 - Kept user value separate from mapping fidelity and left concrete distillation, representation, scoring and release thresholds open for the next discussion.
 - Synchronized current product summaries without asserting runtime implementation or changing technical decisions.
+- Added the required student-owned step: understand the advice, decide whether to adopt it, and articulate the goal and execution requirements to the operation Agent. Direct forwarding, automatic dispatch or one-click adoption cannot replace this expression. Student expression is evidence for observing understanding, not proof of understanding.
+- Replaced the open-ended direct handoff proposal with this explicit boundary; retained result review and further teacher judgment based on available evidence. Updated the same five canonical documents, with no runtime changes.
 
 ## Verification
 
 - Independent review passed: all confirmed points covered; detailed methodology remains open; research and implementation boundaries are explicit.
 - Project documentation structure check, task-aware integration drift check and `git diff --check` passed. Six consensus references resolve to existing local files and the stable positioning heading.
 - Inspected the complete positioning diff and all changed paths: five canonical documents plus this integration record, with no runtime changes. No runtime tests applicable to this prose-only update.
+- Resumed correction: independent semantic-boundary review, documentation structure, task-aware drift and whitespace checks passed. New student-expression references resolve and the superseded open handoff proposal is removed. Reviewed the complete canonical diff; only the same five documents and this own task record changed.
 
 ## Follow-ups