Files
wyndham-ARR/.project-docs/60-reflection/cases/2026-08-11-technical-surfaces-need-explicit-entry-controls.md
2026-08-11 17:23:33 +08:00

40 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown

# Reflection: Technical Surfaces Need Explicit Entry Controls
## Trigger
The user corrected the production Daily interaction: clicking a concrete business row unexpectedly opened the full
technical task log, even though a named `任务日志` utility already existed in the header.
## Expected Behavior
Inspecting business data should be inert unless a cell exposes a clear business action. Dense diagnostic material
should appear only after an explicit, accurately named user action.
## Actual Behavior
Every Daily row was visually and semantically a hidden log button. Mouse click, Enter and Space opened the dialog, so
the same technical surface had both a deliberate header entry and an implicit whole-row entry.
## Root Cause
- A convenient job-selection interaction was conflated with permission to reveal diagnostic detail.
- Handler removal alone had not been treated as enough; row role, focusability, cursor and selected styling also encoded
the obsolete action.
- Earlier acceptance covered the special needs-review button but did not assert that all ordinary rows were inert.
## Lesson
When a product has a dedicated diagnostic control, make it the sole opener unless row-level diagnostics are an explicit
requirement. A behavior change is complete only when event handlers, keyboard paths, accessibility semantics, visual
affordances and regression tests all agree.
## Action
- Keep Daily rows informational and retain only explicit download/review controls inside them.
- Assert that the named header utility is the only task-log opener.
- Verify ordinary row, business-action and diagnostic-entry clicks separately in browser acceptance.
## Promotion
Promoted to project success criteria, current state, focused static UI contracts and the 2026-08-11 interaction evidence.