# Task: Integrate approved teacher cyber mapping product consensus ## Identity - Task ID: 20261008-teacher-consensus-integration-a9c2d7e1 - Mode: Integration - Branch: main - Worktree: /Users/chillishark/Makelore 麦洛/makelore - Base commit: 753eb6ca7e743433d2fc55ee47a9bcbe2b6447c5 - Owner: codex - Status: Ready for Integration ## Scope - Integrate the explicitly approved teacher Agent consensus into product positioning, README, the teacher ADR, decision index and current integrated state. - Resume the same consensus task for the user's correction requiring student understanding and self-expression before operation Agent execution. - Resume on 2026-10-09 to record the accepted eight dimensions of inner mapping and explicit first-version priority on dimensions 1–5, with dimensions 6–8 deferred; synchronize the user's prior equal-status clarification in the same canonical documents. ## Intent And Constraints - User confirmation on 2026-10-08 replaces the old exceptional-person capability-transfer positioning with bespoke real-teacher mapping, insights and experience, user connection and teacher-led mapping acceptance. - Documentation only. Preserve current runtime, published configurations and permissions. No personal Codex history access or distillation implementation. - Concurrent and Planning Gates passed. Required project memory, evidence/reflection/commitment indexes and peer scopes were read; related runtime tasks have no dependency on this prose change. One older child-language task has incomplete scope and is not a source for this integration. - Source proposal `5506922ba9e6528895eab965ef9beae3d7528ebe` exists in the shared Git repository; its completed source task record was reviewed read-only. Its exceptional-person positioning conflict is resolved by the user's explicit new direction. The source branch is retained without merging its administrative record. - The user explicitly rejects direct teacher-to-operation execution handoff. Do not infer an exam, automatic understanding score, execution gate or a ban on sharing project facts from this correction. Resumed ownership and Planning Gates passed; peer records were re-read without changes. - Current human confirmation narrows MVP scope to the first five dimensions. Do not retain the assistant's suggestion to make the seventh dimension a separate mandatory first-version target. Preserve factual case context without adding a sixth mapping goal. The teacher name does not establish a student identity or hierarchical relationship. - 2026-10-09 resumed ownership matches task/mode/main/path; context gate passed. Twenty-five peer records were assessed read-only; legacy runtime/UX work is independent of this prose update. The child-language peer has unspecified scope and is not a consensus source. No private Codex histories were accessed. ## Outcome - Canonical consensus now defines the specific real-person mapping, core insights and experience, individual styles and duties, and the user connection. - Recorded explicit/tacit knowledge and contextual evidence direction, candidate elicitation sources, primary research limits, and teacher participation in independent held-out mapping acceptance. - Kept user value separate from mapping fidelity and left concrete distillation, representation, scoring and release thresholds open for the next discussion. - Synchronized current product summaries without asserting runtime implementation or changing technical decisions. - Added the required student-owned step: understand the advice, decide whether to adopt it, and articulate the goal and execution requirements to the operation Agent. Direct forwarding, automatic dispatch or one-click adoption cannot replace this expression. Student expression is evidence for observing understanding, not proof of understanding. - Replaced the open-ended direct handoff proposal with this explicit boundary; retained result review and further teacher judgment based on available evidence. Updated the same five canonical documents, with no runtime changes. - Added all eight inner-mapping dimensions and their meanings to authoritative positioning, with dimensions 1–5 explicitly marked as first-version priorities and 6–8 deferred. Recorded conditional new-situation judgment and revision as the intended validation direction; trial domain and thresholds remain open. - Updated current consensus wording to specific real-person mapping and equal-status interaction, replacing student labels only in the current consensus summaries; historical runtime/billing and worklog statements remain historical. User self-expression before operation Agent execution remains required. - Tool-trace adequacy is the next discussion topic, not an accepted evidence conclusion or an implemented extraction capability. ## Verification - Independent review passed: all confirmed points covered; detailed methodology remains open; research and implementation boundaries are explicit. - Project documentation structure check, task-aware integration drift check and `git diff --check` passed. Six consensus references resolve to existing local files and the stable positioning heading. - Inspected the complete positioning diff and all changed paths: five canonical documents plus this integration record, with no runtime changes. No runtime tests applicable to this prose-only update. - Resumed correction: independent semantic-boundary review, documentation structure, task-aware drift and whitespace checks passed. New student-expression references resolve and the superseded open handoff proposal is removed. Reviewed the complete canonical diff; only the same five documents and this own task record changed. - 2026-10-09 scope update: independent read-only semantic review passed for all eight meanings, first-version 1–5 scope, deferred 6–8, equal-status interaction, user-owned execution expression and unimplemented/private-data boundaries. Documentation structure, integration-aware drift and whitespace checks passed; all 11 added local references resolve, including the eight-dimension, first-version and renamed user-expression anchors. Inspected full diff: only the same five canonical files and this own task record changed. No runtime tests apply to this documentation-only update. ## Follow-ups - Discuss whether authorized Codex and other tool traces can support the first five mapping priorities, distinguish person-originated evidence from AI contributions, and identify gaps for later clarification. No actual private-history collection, new runtime implementation, worktree cleanup or external publication is requested. ## Promotion Candidates - Applied the user-approved positioning proposal to the canonical documents listed in Scope; no further promotion pending from this task.