Task: Verify Docker image build command

Identity

Restore the missing .project-docs structure with the bundled non-overwriting initializer after explicit user authorization.
Verify the Docker image build command from the repository's actual Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml.

Preserve any existing project documentation; do not use initializer overwrite mode.
Do not change application source or Docker configuration.
Distinguish command/configuration verification from an actual image build.

Added the 34 missing .project-docs template files without overwriting existing files.
Confirmed that the repository root is the Docker build context, the default root Dockerfile is used, no build arguments are required, and the Compose image tag is zhinian-aigc:latest.
Confirmed the direct build command is docker build -t zhinian-aigc:latest .; the Compose-only equivalent is docker compose build zhinian-aigc.

check_project_docs.py: passed after initialization.
Inspected Dockerfile, .dockerignore, docker-compose.yml, package.json, next.config.ts, and the deployment guidance in the README files.
Docker CLI 28.4.0 is installed locally, but the Docker Desktop Linux engine is not running, so an actual image build was not executed.

Start Docker Desktop (or another Docker daemon) before running the build command on this machine.
Unrelated canonical project-memory sections still contain placeholders; the serialized RDS integration task only populates facts verified by that completed implementation.
The user subsequently authorized merging the completed RDS/ACK work into main. As a prerequisite, the initializer-created document baseline and this task record were committed as 4177570, resolving the previously blocked untracked-document state without deleting or overwriting those files.

Target: canonical .project-docs project positioning, architecture, and current-state files. Proposal: replace initialization placeholders with verified facts from the repository in a serialized integration task. Evidence: the required documents now exist but retain bundled template placeholders. Future impact: future planning can rely on meaningful project memory instead of treating canonical context as unknown. Semantic conflicts: none identified; README text appears encoding-corrupted in the current shell and should not be copied blindly. Human confirmation required: yes, before accepting positioning or architecture statements.