diff --git a/.project-docs/30-worklog/tasks/20261008-production-review-9e7b.md b/.project-docs/30-worklog/tasks/20261008-production-review-9e7b.md
index f62edbc..b4154b2 100644
--- a/.project-docs/30-worklog/tasks/20261008-production-review-9e7b.md
+++ b/.project-docs/30-worklog/tasks/20261008-production-review-9e7b.md
@@ -322,3 +322,11 @@ Read: memory-index, project-positioning, current-state latest September sections
 - Handoff corrections: updated root field mapping, direct-input guide and deployment handover to the actual current4.4.0/019→020→021 contract, user-approved cancellation/PM exclusion, conditional normal association blanks, unified manual review, independent pending dates and truthful acquisition progress. Replaced obsolete claims that10/7 still needs fields with its saved succeeded38-room result, explicitly retaining the limit that actual workbook/monthly business contents were not newly validated. Both package hashes independently recalculated as `aac23951ca72cc6878b617cddaaa5dffd9dc6fe2dee1c9036db61c880118a134`. These are task-relevant root operational guides, not feature writes to canonical `.project-docs` memory. Handoff/document commit is published after code and independently tip-checked; no application code changed during this push follow-up.
 - Verification/boundaries: existing completed feature tests remain applicable and were not repeated solely for documentation/push. Working diff whitespace and project-doc ownership checks passed; publication-range whitespace check with CRLF allowed passed. Default full-range whitespace check reported only CRLF endings from the pre-existing task-gate initialization commit; those shared template files were not modified or normalized. No running service restart/config change, database/schema operation, Oracle request, report generation, actual review value mutation, primary checkout adoption or deployment occurred in this follow-up. No PR was created. The unmanaged owned worktree remains retained because the local8875 service uses it; it is not eligible for automatic retirement and no cleanup is required to deliver the push.
 - Follow-up/promotion: target deployment must apply the bundled migrations and release Web/processor together, then perform actual daily/monthly file acceptance with authorized data. Remote publication is a source handoff, not evidence that the target host deployed or passed business acceptance. Canonical-memory reconciliation remains a separate integration-mode promotion candidate; no policy reversal or additional business decision is required for this handoff.
+
+
+## Same-task Follow-up: September17 Empty Manual Check
+
+- User asks why9/17 still appears in manual review when its table is empty. Concurrent Task Gate Passed for the same resumed feature/codex/owned checkout/branch/base, no peers and clean initial worktree. Project Context Loaded: retained required entry/memory/positioning/ADR004/006/007/architecture/domain/evidence/reflection/commitments/stale context, refreshed task record and inspected source-review/executor/queue behavior. Planning Gate Passed for read-only diagnosis; this question does not itself request actual source finalization, report generation or a business-rule change.
+- Authenticated existing request04df0edb6743fbaa576d25063008c127 remains `needs_data_review`, job_id=null; source acquisition is complete106/106/100%. Review revision4 is editing, pending_count=0,total_count=0,can_finalize=true, with18 cancellations and11 PM exclusions. No user field input is still required. `DataFieldReviews.prepare` explicitly retains reanalyzed/status-evidence legacy reviews until finalized even when all gaps disappear; ordinary new complete input without those legacy interpretation checkpoints skips manual review. DirectARRExecutor returns needs_data_review until this retained review has a frozen payload. This is a legacy confirmation hold, not an additional field/rule failure or unfinished acquisition.
+- Outcome/boundaries: explain that corrected optional association interpretation and approved exclusions cleared the historical issues, but the old task deliberately retained its final continue/generate action. The empty panel currently misrepresents that action as manual checking. Its enabled “确认并生成日报” continues the same saved request/source without refetching; subsequent shared processing may still identify price review if required. No Oracle request, actual review/value/finalization, job generation, report/monthly mutation, UI/code change, restart or primary edit performed. No test run needed for read-only diagnosis. Documentation structure/ownership/whitespace gates apply.
+- Product follow-up/promotion candidate: integration-owned product flow should distinguish a legacy0-item ready-to-continue state from actual pending field/price issues, rather than showing an empty manual-check table. Current user question establishes confusion, not authorization to silently finalize an existing saved-source interpretation or auto-generate a report. Preserve original task/audit and use existing explicit continue control until the intended transition is changed.