Update production handover and record latest release push

This commit is contained in:
Wyndham ARR committed 2026-10-08 23:49:51 +08:00
1 parent db42a5e087
commit 55d0a1ef61
4 files changed
+73 -42

No files matched your search

@@ -311,3 +311,14 @@ Read: memory-index, project-positioning, current-state latest September sections
- Actual UI verification: a temporary loopback-only synthetic fixture verified unknown total →58/85 at68% →85/85 verification at99% →100% while report processing continues →failed68%, without Oracle, real database or report mutations. Fixture/tab were stopped and closed. Before activation the real queue had no active tasks. Gracefully restarted the same8875 LaunchAgent once; all required processing/acquisition/monthly/download health checks are ready. In a new independent tab,9/15 now shows85/85,100%,取数状态已完成, while its original room item remains0/1 and generation disabled.9/17 API reports106/106 completed. The replayed9/16 request lacks an original source folder, so it truthfully shows completed with historical counts unavailable rather than borrowing counts from another request.375px CSS-width check confirms scrollWidth=clientWidth and visible counts; temporary viewport override reset. User tabs were not reloaded.
- Preservation/evidence: exact authenticated before/after comparison confirms all3 complete manual-review objects, all15 original capture metadata hashes, and all6 queue statuses/job IDs/attempt counters unchanged. No new Oracle request, hotel write, price/source decision, finalization, report/monthly generation, schema/config/credential change, primary checkout edit or remote push occurred. Private evidence remains in `production-validation-20261007/acquisition-progress-{before,after}-20261008.json`, synthetic fixture source, and `acquisition-progress-local-20261008.png`; actual result tab retained. Node syntax, Git whitespace and project-document gates apply before commit.
- Promotion candidate: integration-owned product/data-flow/current-state documentation should describe reservation-level acquisition progress as a distinct observed stage, with unknown totals before paging completes and100% only after completeness/checkpoint success. Acquisition completion does not establish report completion or remove manual review. No new business-policy decision or ADR conflict. Remaining limitation: some replayed historical requests have no own acquisition counts; current new acquisitions persist them. Existing unresolved local-status fetch timeout resilience and same-page price redraw draft behavior remain separate follow-ups, not claimed fixed here.
## Same-task Follow-up: Push Latest Completed Code
- User explicitly authorizes finishing and pushing the latest code to the previously supplied repository. Concurrent Task Gate Passed for resumed20261008-production-review-9e7b/feature/codex at the same owned checkout/branch/base2417b1a, no peers and clean initial worktree. Project Context Loaded: refreshed entry/planning gates and core memory/positioning/current-state/decision index/system overview; retained task-relevant ADR004/006/007, domain/evidence/reflection/commitments/stale context and all preceding task outcomes. Canonical memory remains the older integrated snapshot and is not rewritten in feature mode; accepted follow-ups are recorded in this task. Goal: publish the completed implementation to the user's designated repository without adopting unknown primary-checkout work, changing running service/data, exposing private runtime material or forcing remote history. Modules: Git release handoff and this task record only. Planning Gate Passed.
- Verified target `arr0918` is `https://git.nianxx.cn/shiyuyun/ARR-2.0-0918.git`; preserved separate original remote. Remote default branch/main currentlyad2c59256fedd82d88bb571430c6eaf07f9640c4, an ancestor of tested code tipdb42a5e. Local code has24 additional commits and no remote-only commits, so no conflict resolution, rebase, force-push or primary-checkout adoption is needed. Plan: review the publication range for private runtime artifacts, push the owned committed result to remote main, verify exact remote tip, then commit/push the handoff record. Existing completed test results apply; no new code change or business-test expansion is required.
- Publication outcome: fast-forward push to the designated remote main succeeded fromad2c592 to tested code tipdb42a5e087d2203927099b41a2805f8f0d700229; independent `git ls-remote arr0918 refs/heads/main` returned that exact commit. No force/rebase/history replacement. Read-only publication review covered24 commits,80 changed paths and186 historical changed blobs, including both processor archives; no newly introduced runtime credentials, private captures/databases, XML/business reports or unexpected large files were found. Test literals were distinguished from real credentials without printing values. Archive workbook members match the target remote's original members byte-for-byte; maximum changed blob approximately189KB.
- Handoff corrections: updated root field mapping, direct-input guide and deployment handover to the actual current4.4.0/019→020→021 contract, user-approved cancellation/PM exclusion, conditional normal association blanks, unified manual review, independent pending dates and truthful acquisition progress. Replaced obsolete claims that10/7 still needs fields with its saved succeeded38-room result, explicitly retaining the limit that actual workbook/monthly business contents were not newly validated. Both package hashes independently recalculated as `aac23951ca72cc6878b617cddaaa5dffd9dc6fe2dee1c9036db61c880118a134`. These are task-relevant root operational guides, not feature writes to canonical `.project-docs` memory. Handoff/document commit is published after code and independently tip-checked; no application code changed during this push follow-up.
- Verification/boundaries: existing completed feature tests remain applicable and were not repeated solely for documentation/push. Working diff whitespace and project-doc ownership checks passed; publication-range whitespace check with CRLF allowed passed. Default full-range whitespace check reported only CRLF endings from the pre-existing task-gate initialization commit; those shared template files were not modified or normalized. No running service restart/config change, database/schema operation, Oracle request, report generation, actual review value mutation, primary checkout adoption or deployment occurred in this follow-up. No PR was created. The unmanaged owned worktree remains retained because the local8875 service uses it; it is not eligible for automatic retirement and no cleanup is required to deliver the push.
- Follow-up/promotion: target deployment must apply the bundled migrations and release Web/processor together, then perform actual daily/monthly file acceptance with authorized data. Remote publication is a source handoff, not evidence that the target host deployed or passed business acceptance. Canonical-memory reconciliation remains a separate integration-mode promotion candidate; no policy reversal or additional business decision is required for this handoff.